I spent a long time in the car on Friday and, in between various CDs, I was listening to the radio. A major theme was “fuel poverty” in the UK, which was defined as a family that has to spend 10% or more of its income on fuel.
The government was being criticised for not making sufficient progress on tackling this. However, I did notice a couple of things that weren’t discussed. Firstly, whether “fuel” includes petrol costs as well as household fuel bills. Secondly, whether this measure of fuel poverty takes into account a reasonable level of usage. If a low-income family has numerous electronic gadgets, including several TVs that are rarely off, and keeps the heating at tropical levels they could easily pass the 10% threshold. However, is it truly poverty if the cause is wanton consumption?
I know that fuel prices have gone up significantly. Our last gas bill was significantly higher than a couple of years ago although we had actually made a reduction in the number of units used. However, in the debates about fuel poverty I think politicians and the media have a responsibility to remind people of the importance of being sparing with energy use. If our society could deal with over-consumption it would be much easier to pinpoint where actual poverty exists.
Want to add something? Please join the conversation about this posting (nb. Yahoo! account required to log into Flickr).